A brand new decentralized autonomous group purportedly made up of a “devoted group of Azuki fans,” has launched a proposal to claw again 20,000 Ether (ETH) from Zagabond, the founding father of the blue-chip non-fungible token (NFT) model Azuki.
The proposal, initiated on July 2, outlines hiring a lawyer to take authorized motion in opposition to Zagabond, actual title Alex Xu, for allegedly “rugging” a number of initiatives. The clawback seeks $39 million price of ETH earned from the launch of Azuki’s controversial “Elementals” assortment. It proposes to allocate any funds retrieved again to the DAO to “promote the expansion of your entire Azuki neighborhood.”
On the time of publication, 88.11% of the DAO’s Bean tokens have been used to vote in favor of the motion, whereas 11.9% have voted in opposition to it. The proposal is scheduled to finish at 6:38 am UTC on July 3.
Who’s AzukiDAO?
Nevertheless, whereas AzukiDAO claims to be made up of “OG Azuki holders,” some have questioned the origins of the DAO and its relationship to members of the Azuki mission.
In a July 3 Twitter thread, pseudonymous commentator @tytan.eth knowledgeable his 19,000 followers that the majority Azuki holders had by no means heard of the AzukiDAO and assumed it was “both faux or a gaggle with malicious intent.”
Right here’s extra data on the place the unique tweet in regards to the AzukiDAO got here from. Most Azuki holders have by no means heard of this group and assume it’s both faux or a gaggle with malicious intent.
The token for voting was minted two days in the past sooo there’s that: https://t.co/pF37xr0fQE https://t.co/0SbJLKcnNT
— Tytan.ETH (@Tytaninc) July 2, 2023
In the meantime, information from Etherscan reveals the contract for the “Bean” token getting used to vote on the proposal was minted simply two days in the past, whereas the related Twitter web page was created solely in June 2023 and its Discord channel reveals solely 116 members.
Cointelegraph contacted Azuki, Zagabond and AzukiDAO for remark however didn’t obtain a right away response.
Elementals controversy defined
Holders of Azuki NFTs and pundits from the broader NFT neighborhood have levied a great deal of criticism on the Azuki group ever because the controversial launch of its “Azuki Elementals” assortment on June 27.
The “Elementals” mission was first hinted at throughout an Azuki-branded occasion hosted in Las Vegas on June 23. A small allocation of the 20,000 NFTs was airdropped to pick out Azuki holders.
The remaining NFTs turned accessible for buy at 4 pm on June 27. Current holders of Azuki NFTs and holders of “BEANZ” — one other spinoff mission — got a 20-minute pre-sale window.
Associated: Sure, the Secret Service has an NFT assortment, and no, it’s not on the market
The sale by no means went public, as your entire assortment was snapped up in non-public gross sales in underneath quarter-hour. General, the launch earned the Azuki group a complete of $38 million.
This drew widespread backlash, with grievances starting from the small pre-sale window, to mint failures from an overloaded web site, and the shortage of originality within the new NFTs artwork.
NFT holders additionally expressed their concern that releasing 20,000 new NFTs would dilute the worth of pre-existing NFTs within the assortment. The controversy reached its peak when the mission group reportedly transferred 20,000 ETH from the pockets quickly after the gathering was minted out.
