Coinbase hit with proposed trademark lawsuit over Nano by-product merchandise

by Jeremy

Crypto alternate Coinbase has been named as a defendant in a authorized criticism introduced by NanoLabs — the corporate behind the digital forex Nano (NANO) — over alleged trademark infringement. 

Within the Feb. 24 submitting with the California Northern District Courtroom, NanoLabs alleged Coinbase’s Nano Bitcoin futures contract and Nano Ether futures contract merchandise infringe on trademark rights owned by them.

It’s additionally alleged the infringement has prompted NanoLabs financial detriment and weakened its model identification, leading to “precise injury and irreparable hurt.” 

Colin LeMahieu based the Nano digital forex in 2014; which was initially named RaiBlocks. It was rebranded to Nano on Jan. 31, 2018.

Years later, Coinbase launched its Nano Bitcoin futures contract on June 27, 2022, and its Nano Ether futures contract on Aug. 29, 2022.

Within the criticism, NanoLabs argued the choices launched by Coinbase are “by-product merchandise” primarily based on Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), which “are an identical or extremely related” to its digital forex Nano.

It additionally argued that Coinbase targets the identical kind of customers as NanoLabs, being “these looking for to put money into, and make the most of, a digital forex,” and that the logos for Coinbase’s merchandise “are an identical, and […] confusingly related,” to NanoLabs.

It additionally alleges that Coinbase had full data of the Nano digital forex earlier than launching its merchandise on account of correspondence between the 2 corporations beginning in 2018, which later resulted in Coinbase allegedly denying NanoLab’s utility to listing Nano on Coinbase. 

“Thus, since at the least October 17, 2018, numerous division heads and administrators, in addition to associates, in numerous departments at Coinbase had been aware of the Nano Digital Forex.”

NanoLabs additional argued that Coinbase ought to “have recognized that providing Nano Bitcoin on the Coinbase Derivates Alternate would solely additional client confusion.” 

“Notably as a result of the Nano Digital Forex shouldn’t be listed on the Coinbase Alternate, and Defendants’ present no disclaimer, distinction, or in any other case to coach customers so far,” the courtroom paperwork learn.

Associated: Decide dismisses proposed class-action swimsuit alleging Coinbase securities gross sales

NanoLabs is asking the Courtroom for an injunction in opposition to Coinbase to cease them from utilizing the phrase “Nano” and all related logos and domains of an identical nature.

NanoLabs can be looking for at the least $5 million in damages, corrective promoting from Coinbase, destruction of all supplies infringing on the Nano trademark, and forfeiture of all earnings Coinbase made utilizing Nano logos. It has requested a jury trial.

Excerpt from NanoLabs criticism in opposition to Coinbase. Supply: Courtlistener

Cointelegraph reached out to each Coinbase and NanoLabs for remark however didn’t obtain a reply by the point of publication.