Because the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem grows in dimension and affect, the query of tips on how to finest govern DeFi protocols has taken heart stage. In crypto-native circles, decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) are far and away the most well-liked governance constructions.
DAOs are sometimes touted as an all-in-one repair for every little thing from investor-manager alignment to regulatory threat. Nevertheless, as a spate of well-publicized inner disputes and regulatory crackdowns has proven, DAO governance shouldn’t be a panacea.
Blockchain expertise, particularly trustless good contracts and distributed ledgers, has created an unprecedented alternative to construct a extra clear monetary system, with fewer centralized intermediaries. Nevertheless, these applied sciences are nonetheless nascent. They need to be used to enrich — not exchange — conventional authorized constructions.
With regards to safeguarding traders, there’s merely no substitute for conventional authorized entities and investor safety rules.
The issue with present DAO fashions
Though DAOs purport to be decentralized and autonomous, the overwhelming majority of them are nearly similar to traditional expertise startups, with founders, traders, product roadmaps and go-to-market methods.
The primary distinction between DAOs and conventional companies is that DAOs, by and enormous, don’t function inside established authorized frameworks. Many DAOs are successfully unincorporated associations. The rest often go for comparatively unique, untested authorized constructions, which confer few, if any, authorized rights to stakeholders.
Associated: Elizabeth Warren is pushing the Senate to ban your crypto pockets
That’s dangerous information for traders and customers, who’re left with little to no recourse if one thing goes unsuitable. It’s additionally an issue for regulators, which has resulted in DAOs going through essential regulatory points. This consists of taxation of DAO tokens, treasuries, and investments, implementation of Anti-Cash Laundering (AML) guidelines and Combating the Financing of Terrorism insurance policies, in addition to foundational questions of possession, management and accountability.
Lately, DAO decision-making has drawn specific curiosity from the authorized system, with regarding penalties for traders. In two latest courtroom instances in the US involving bZx DAO and Ooki DAO, officers took the stance that as governing members of a DAO, tokenholders themselves could also be personally responsible for authorized infractions or negligence by a DeFi protocol’s core group.
As an business, DeFi should do a greater job of upholding the rights of customers and tokenholders. A number of regulatory pathways exist, each globally and inside the US, that provide vital protections for traders, in addition to appreciable flexibility to DeFi protocols.
DAOs have potential that hasn’t been realized
Whereas the present mannequin of DAO governance is flawed, the underlying expertise nonetheless holds huge potential. In actual fact, decentralized blockchain expertise could be a highly effective complement to conventional investor-protection rules.
For instance, trustless good contracts and self-custodied “receipt” tokens have the potential to render many types of mismanagement and malfeasance by asset managers nearly unattainable. Equally, decentralized oracles can guarantee traders all the time have entry to unbiased, up-to-date information on efficiency, thus enormously diminishing the scope for fraud.
On the identical time, blockchain applied sciences comparable to zero-knowledge identify-proofs promise to ease the burden of regulatory compliance for DeFi functions whereas defending customers’ privateness and anonymity. With distinctive cryptographic proof, customers can full in-app Know Your Buyer (KYC) and AML checks nearly immediately with out ever disclosing their private data.
For all its flaws, on-chain governance has the potential to allow value-enhancing participation and ensures that investor resolutions are really binding. The one lacking hyperlink stopping this expertise from reaching its full potential is authorized compliance.
Hybrid fashions can work
As with most rising applied sciences, there’s at present an absence of oversight relating to DAO regulation. Nevertheless, the novelty of each blockchain and DAOs doesn’t erode the necessity for regulatory compliance. If something, it heightens it.
The necessity for proactive authorized compliance in DeFi has by no means been extra pressing. Regulatory establishments are cracking down on DAOs greater than ever. A latest instance of that is the Sushi DAO debacle, whereby the Securities and Change Fee issued a subpoena to the platform. The SEC indicated it was investigating potential securities regulation violations, together with promoting tokens that could be thought of securities with out correct registration.
Associated: OpenAI wants a DAO to handle ChatGPT
DeFi protocols must rethink the DAO mannequin. For protocols with securities-like governance tokens, the best choice could also be abandoning the DAO construction altogether. In the US, established authorized entities comparable to personal funds could supply protocols appreciable flexibility whereas clarifying and strengthening authorized protections for tokenholders.
Equally, DeFi protocols ought to take into account housing their full-time core groups inside registered restricted legal responsibility corporations, or their equal in jurisdictions exterior the US. Company constructions are essential for safeguarding group members from private legal responsibility and constructing efficient, streamlined organizations.
DAOs have the potential to make an enormous distinction in each Web3 and mainstream companies. The answer shouldn’t be pitting decentralized and conventional finance in opposition to one another as adversaries — it’s integrating the strengths of each.
Alex O’Donnell is the founder and CEO of Umami Labs and labored as an early contributor to Umami DAO. Previous to Umami Labs, he labored for seven years as a monetary journalist at Reuters, the place he lined M&A and IPOs.
This text is for basic data functions and isn’t meant to be and shouldn’t be taken as authorized or funding recommendation. The views, ideas and opinions expressed listed below are the creator’s alone and don’t essentially mirror or characterize the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.
