Disparities in info entry and information analytics expertise are what give institutional gamers an edge over common retail traders within the digital asset house.
The core concept behind Markets Professional, Cointelegraph’s crypto-intelligence platform powered by information analytics agency The Tie, is to equalize the data asymmetries current within the cryptocurrency market.
Markets Professional bridges the hole of those asymmetries with its world-class performance: the quant-style VORTECS™ Rating.
The VORTECS™ Rating is an algorithmic comparability of a number of key market metrics for every coin using years of historic information that assesses whether or not the outlook for an asset is bullish, bearish or impartial at any given second primarily based on the historic report of value motion.
The VORTECS™ Rating is designed to inform merchants that one thing has simply occurred that — previously — reliably moved asset costs.
That’s why Markets Professional chart is one which reveals occasions taking place in the precise order and on the proper time: First comes the indicator, after which value motion follows.
Within the final couple of days, we have now noticed quite a few exemplary situations illustrating traditional Markets Professional insights into the market.
MATIC: VORTECS™ supplies an unique foreshadowing of value drop
November began off promising for these invested in Polygon (MATIC) — however any expectations for lasting positive factors can be left in ruins. The token, regardless of seeing a cushty rise to $1.25 on November 8, 2022, would undergo a steep fall of 35.4% all the way down to $0.807 simply two days later.
Following this was a stunning resurgence, with MATIC going again as much as $1.13 on November 11. However right here’s the kicker: Whereas most merchants solely noticed what was on the floor — MATIC’s potential resurgence in a bear market — Markets Professional members had entry to a wider view.
Even when the worth development seemed promising, the market situations remained traditionally unfavorable for MATIC, suggesting a main promoting alternative — which got here to fruition with one other 22.1% dip to $0.883.
Since August, MATIC’s VORTECS™ Rating remained beneath 74, foreshadowing a value drop that, by all conventional measures, ran opposite to MATIC’s early November bull run as much as $1.25.
All through the primary half of November, its VORTECS™ Rating hovered between 54 and 60. This offered incredible alternatives to money in on not one, however two, value dips for all traders with entry to Markets Professional — no matter their degree of expertise.
GST: VORTECS™ predicts 12% dip
Equally, the Inexperienced Satoshi Token (GST) token noticed a pump from $0.023 to $0.042 — an 82.6% enhance — between November 3–6.
Whereas the typical investor might have been spurred on to purchase in case the worth continued upwards, Markets Professional members have been capable of deduce that this value motion was a purple herring.
It is because on the very top of GST’s bull run, its VORTECS™ Rating took a nosedive from 48 all the way down to 24.
Members acquainted with Markets Professional’s VORTECS™ scoring system would know that 40, a lot much less 24, meant the equal of purple flags and warning bells — and would have had a chance to forestall a serious loss to their place within the coin.
On the time of this writing, GST’s VORTECS™ Rating is 50 and its token value is again round $0.022.
Cointelegraph Markets Professional is obtainable solely to members at $99 per 30 days with a 100% satisfaction assure. We’re providing you entry to the one crypto-intelligence platform on this planet that may offer you the very same buying and selling alerts as establishments and hedge funds in actual time … earlier than this info turns into public information.
Cointelegraph is a writer of economic info, not an funding adviser. We don’t present customized or individualized funding recommendation. Cryptocurrencies are risky investments and carry vital threat together with the danger of everlasting and complete loss. Previous efficiency shouldn’t be indicative of future outcomes. Figures and charts are right on the time of writing or as in any other case specified. Reside-tested methods are usually not suggestions. Seek the advice of your monetary advisor earlier than making monetary selections.
All ROIs quoted are correct as of 8:00 am UTC on Dec. 1, 2022
