Multichain bridging protocol LiFi has launched a multi-message aggregator for decentralized autonomous group (DAO) governance, in response to an Aug. 17 announcement from LiFi analysis lead Arjun Chand. If applied by decentralized exchanges, lending apps and different Web3 protocols, the brand new aggregator ought to assist stop governance assaults that originate from cross-chain bridges, in response to the aggregator’s documentation.
The announcement comes after a vigorous debate over bridge safety on the Uniswap boards in late January and early February concluded that no single bridge has all of the safety features vital for safe governance.
For months, @lifiprotocol has labored carefully with @UniswapFND to develop Multi-Message Aggregation (MMA), an additive safety module for cross-chain messaging.
Here is why we consider MMA might be a future-proof resolution for various cross-chain messaging wants! pic.twitter.com/w34g3ZUNfi
— Arjun | LI.FI (@arjunnchand) August 17, 2023
Crypto alternate Uniswap is ruled by a DAO referred to as UniswapDAO. In January, UniswapDAO started discussing deploying a second copy of Uniswap to BNB Sensible Chain (BSC). This opened the query of how Uniswap could be ruled on multiple chain since, beforehand, all votes have been taken on the Ethereum community. On Jan. 24, the DAO voted to deploy a second copy of Uniswap to BSC and to make use of bridging protocol Celer to ship messages from BSC to Ethereum.
Though this proposal handed, controversy erupted virtually instantly over the selection of Celer Bridge because the technique of sending messages. Some DAO contributors feared that Celer was not safe sufficient to stop cross-chain governance assaults. As an alternative, they really useful Wormhole, LayerZero or DeBridge be used. Different contributors defended Celer as the right alternative.
On Jan. 31, the DAO held a second vote on which bridge must be used for governance. Wormhole received the vote and was chosen because the official bridge for governance.
Regardless of the win for Wormhole, the referendum was contentious. Solely 62% of Uniswap (UNI) tokens have been used to solid “sure” votes. Against this, many UniswapDAO proposals acquired practically unanimous votes for or in opposition to.
Within the debate main as much as the vote, many contributors concluded that Uniswap ought to use a number of bridges as a substitute of only one. This fashion, if one bridge grew to become hacked, the opposite bridges would reject the malicious messages despatched by it, and the assault could be prevented. Nonetheless, no multi-bridge resolution was obtainable on the time. Therefore, the proposal’s supporters argued that Wormhole must be used till a multi-bridge resolution might be created.
Associated: Token hoarders defeat the aim of most DAOs: Examine
Within the Aug. 18 announcement from LiFi, Chand stated the crew’s new bridge aggregator would offer “a future-proof resolution for various cross-chain messaging wants,” stopping protocols sooner or later from needing to depend on a single bridge for governance messages.
Based on the aggregator’s paperwork, protocols can use LiFi to require that votes be confirmed on two out of three bridges to be legitimate. For instance, if one bridge says {that a} DAO tokenholder voted “sure” however the two different bridges say that they voted “no,” the “no” vote will probably be confirmed. The aggregator will also be configured to make use of three out of 5 bridges or some other ratio the DAO needs.
LiFi isn’t the one crew to create a multi-bridge aggregator for DAO governance. Gnosis launched an analogous protocol referred to as “Hashi” in March.
In June, a UniswapDAO committee claimed that Hashi was “not but production-ready,” had pending audits and didn’t have a bug bounty. Subsequently, the committee concluded that it was unsuitable to deal with DAO governance.
The LiFi aggregator has additionally not been audited. Chand claimed in his announcement that “quickly, we’ll broaden its testing and submit it for an audit by Path of Bits.”
