May regulation have prevented Sam Bankman-Fried’s legal verdict?

by Jeremy

Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried was discovered responsible of all seven counts of fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud within the late hours of Nov. 2. The jury delivered its verdict in lower than 10 minutes after almost 4 hours of deliberation, leaving his mother and father to fall silent within the crowded courtroom on the Southern District Court docket of New York. 

Over the course of his prolonged trial, my ideas stored returning to: How did you come to be right here? May all of this hurt have been prevented? What can we do to keep away from the following FTX?

Some say that present monetary laws may have prevented the collapse of FTX. Having to adjust to regulatory necessities, Bankman-Fried would by no means have been in a position to commingle and embezzle buyer funds.

FTX used Alameda Analysis as a “fee processor,” as described by Bankman-Fried’s protection. One in every of Alameda’s subsidiaries, Northern Dimension, had acquired deposits from FTX clients because the trade was based. With none company management, the businesses commingled funds. 

Commingling of funds could not essentially contain fraudulent intent, however it will possibly nonetheless be problematic as a result of lack of transparency and accountability. In actual fact, it’s a “soiled phrase” in securities legislation, an lawyer observing Bankman-Fried’s trial defined.

Embezzlement, then again, usually includes intentional and fraudulent actions and happens when one in command of funds makes use of the capital for private acquire or unauthorized functions. Bankman-Fried, based on prosecutors, used billions of {dollars} in enterprise capital investments, actual property acquisitions and political donations for private acquire. None of those funds belonged to him.

With out company controls, his protection couldn’t show that the $8 billion lacking from shoppers was the results of the market downturn reasonably than the misappropriation of funds.

Bankman-Fried had excessive ambitions. He dreamed of being the president of the US. He thought rising FTX can be the one strategy to cowl the billion-dollar gap on its steadiness sheet, however it was too late for FTX. As Warren Buffett correctly stated, “You solely discover out who’s swimming bare when the tide goes out.”

Ultimately, Bankman-Fried was caught not for crypto fraud however for conventional fraud. Theoretically, regulatory guardrails may have prevented him from commingling and embezzling funds, however the legislation gained’t forestall somebody who believes they’re uncatchable from doing fallacious. 

This text is for common info functions and isn’t supposed to be and shouldn’t be taken as authorized or funding recommendation. The views, ideas, and opinions expressed listed below are the writer’s alone and don’t essentially mirror or characterize the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.