Nirvana bassist Krist Novoselic led failed shareholder proposal asking Microsoft to check AI security

by Jeremy

Krist Novoselic, co-founder and bass guitarist for the seminal rock band Nirvana, lately led a shareholder proposal presentation urging Microsoft to reevaluate its method to generative synthetic intelligence. 

Referred to as Shareholder Proposal 13: Report on AI Misinformation and Disinformation, per a press launch, the proposal was submitted by Arjuna Capital “on behalf of Krist Novoselic” and a number of other different shareholder teams.

“Novoselic, co-founder and band member of Nirvana, will current the proposal citing issues that Microsoft has not totally thought of the enterprise and societal dangers of generative AI amid its fast deployment of the know-how.”

Proposed synthetic intelligence dangers

The proposal cited a number of key shareholder issues together with the potential for Microsoft developed or backed fashions to take part within the unfold of mass disinformation and misinformation.

It additionally introduced up questions surrounding whether or not Part 230, a legislation giving web hosts and web site customers restricted protections in opposition to legal responsibility for content material from third events, would even apply to content material generated by the host’s personal generative synthetic intelligence techniques.

In his presentation, Novoselic requested “what occurs when society depends on info generated via Microsoft’s AI-powered Bing, a platform discovered to provide inaccurate solutions ten % of the time?” He additionally introduced up the requires a six month pause on AI growth from consultants earlier this yr which Microsoft, alongside the remainder of the business, selected to not heed.

In line with Novoselic, Microsoft’s rush to market “seemingly prioritized brief time period income over long run success.”

Microsoft’s response

Microsoft’s Board responded to the proposal by stating it had “already fulfilled the proposal’s request with current and upcoming reporting.” Nevertheless, in accordance with Arjun Capital, the proposal’s objective was to get “info that goes past these experiences’ generic commitments to accountable AI.”

Particularly, the shareholders behind the proposal sought to spur Microsoft to comprehensively assess the chance related to generative AI in the long run.

Citing its present packages and reporting as enough, Microsoft’s board made the suggestion that shareholders deny the proposal. The proposal didn’t go a subsequent shareholder vote.

Associated: Microsoft faces UK antitrust probe over OpenAI deal construction

Supply hyperlink

Related Posts

You have not selected any currency to display