Polkadot group PolkaWorld halts operations after failed funding bid

by Jeremy

Polkadot group PolkaWorld has introduced that it has halted its operations after the group’s proposal to get funding from Polkadot’s treasury was rejected. The group raised a number of considerations concerning the mission’s treasury administration and made a number of claims in a latest announcement. 

In a put up revealed on PolkaWorld’s official X (previously Twitter) account, the group claimed that the treasury administration beneath Polkadot’s new open governance platform, OpenGov, is affecting long-term contributors to the Polkadot ecosystem. In response to PolkaWorld, many organizations are being rejected by the treasury and are leaving the Polkadot ecosystem.

The group identified that within the earlier governance system, there was a council elected by Polkadot (DOT) holders. The council members have been consultants in sure areas and have been educated in evaluating proposals, in response to PolkaWorld. PolkaWorld believes that this must be built-in into the present OpenGov system, the place governance is set by tokenholders immediately. 

In the meantime, Markian Ivanichok, the founding father of the platform Brushfam, which onboards companies to Polkadot, has introduced that the mission is leaving Polkadot in an X thread. The founder expressed frustrations about Polkadot’s governance system, saying that it’s been “more and more exhausting to get financing.”

Throughout the thread, Ivanichok additionally claimed that it was not possible to get their work appreciated in an ecosystem that “doesn’t care about customers, about enterprise practices and about advertising its product.”

Associated: NFT platform Enjin forks Polkadot parachain Efinity to new mainnet

Polkadot’s OpenGov system was launched earlier this 12 months to grant each tokenholder a voice in shaping the platform. With this, governance within the community is immediately carried out by holders of the DOT token. They will actively take part in a voting course of to vote on proposals geared toward making modifications of their ecosystem.

Journal: Joe Lubin: The reality about ETH founders cut up and ‘Crypto Google’