US lawmaker Brad Sherman has questioned why the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has not gone after crypto exchanges facilitating Ripple (XRP) trades if it considers it to be a security.
Sherman raised this question during the Investor Protector subcommittee oversight hearing on July 19. Sherman said:
“The division has determined that XRP is a security and is going after XRP but, for reasons that I’ll bring up in questions, has not gone after the exchanges where tens of thousands of illegal securities transactions were occurring.”
The subcommittee is investigating the SEC’s enforcement role in the crypto industry, and the division director, Gurbir Grewal, testified before it.
In Sherman’s view, the SEC enforcement division needs to do better to play its role effectively.
“If XRP is a security — and you think it is, and I think it is, why are these crypto exchanges not in violation of law and is it enough that the crypto exchanges have said ‘well, having committed tens of thousands of violations in the past, we promise not to do anymore in the future?’ Is that enough to get you off the hook for enforcement?”
He added that the commission should bring enforcement actions against the major exchanges since they knew XRP was illegal securities “because they stopped doing it even though it was profitable.”
Some major crypto exchanges like Coinbase, Bitstamp, and Crypto.com delisted XRP after SEC filed a lawsuit against Ripple.
Ripple fights back
Ripple’s general counsel Stuart Alderoty has refuted Sherman’s statement by pointing out that no court in the United States or anywhere else has declared XRP security.
Only the Court can make a determination (it’s called due process). This is the pernicious effect of the SEC’s reg by enforcement approach – harming people, markets and American innovation – with unproven allegations masquerading as regulation.
— Stuart Alderoty (@s_alderoty) July 19, 2022
According to Alderoty, only a law court can determine whether XRP is a security.
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse also expressed his view of the lawmaker’s statement.
Garlinghouse said the US representative’s comments show that he is only trying to advance a political agenda.
Rep @BradSherman was magna cum laude at Harvard Law. He must know better but is trying -yet again- to advance a political agenda over sound policy and ignoring what the law actually says. https://t.co/ypIotiBIBf
— Brad Garlinghouse (@bgarlinghouse) July 19, 2022
Popular crypto lawyer John Deaton also weighed in on the matter, saying the SEC has “stated that it doesn’t make security determinations — ONLY the Federal District Court can.”
EVERYONE:
Please remember the @SECGov DOES NOT DETERMINE whether an asset is a security.
Go back and read the SEC’s opposition to #XRPHolders Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
The SEC stated that it doesn’t make security determinations – ONLY the Federal District Court can. https://t.co/LL7HZ3K06p
— John E Deaton (207K Followers Beware Imposters) (@JohnEDeaton1) July 19, 2022
