US prosecutors search to ban SBF from Sign after alleged witness contact

by Jeremy

Federal prosecutors have requested that former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried’s (SBF) bail situations are modified to stop additional alleged makes an attempt at influencing witnesses’ testimonies. 

Courtroom paperwork filed on Jan. 27 revealed that The Division of Justice (DOJ) have requested U.S. District Courtroom Decide Lewis Kaplan to ban Bankman-Fried from speaking with “present or former workers” of FTX or Alameda.

The prosecutors have requested this after they alleged that Bankman-Fried had reached out to Ryne Miller, the present Common Counsel of FTX US, over Sign and electronic mail on Jan. 15 making an attempt to “affect” Miller’s testimony. The doc quoted:

“I might actually like to reconnect and see if there’s a manner for us to have a constructive relationship, use one another as assets when attainable, or at the very least vet issues with one another.”

The prosecutors additionally requested that Bankman-Fried is banned from utilizing encrypted communication purposes. 

“The defendant shall not use any encrypted or ephemeral name or messaging utility, together with however not restricted to Sign.”

The doc additional alleged that Bankman-Fried’s use of Sign is in line with “a historical past” of utilizing the applying for obstructive functions.

Associated: FTX chapter lawyer: debtors face ‘assault by Twitter’ stemming from Sam Bankman-Fried

It was beforehand reported in December 2022 that Bankman-Fried denied any involvement or data of a “Wirefraud” group chat on Sign, hours earlier than his arrest by Bahamian police.

The group chat reportedly included members of Bankman-Fried’s inside circle, together with FTX co-founder Zixiao “Gary” Wang, FTX engineer Nishad Singh and former Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison – who allegedly used the group to ship secret details about FTX and Alameda within the lead-up to the collapse.

This comes after attorneys representing FTX within the chapter proceedings had reportedly argued on Jan. 26 that Bankman-Fried’s fast household ought to face questioning relating to any monetary advantages they might have obtained from the trade.