Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin’s weblog submit highlighting the threats he sees synthetic intelligence (AI) may pose to humanity has attracted many fiery responses from AI and blockchain group members.
On Nov. 27, Buterin printed a weblog submit titled My techno-optimism, which mentioned how AI is “basically completely different” from different innovations like weapons, airplanes, and social media. Moreover, Buterin defined that it may develop a brand new type of “thoughts,” which may work towards people and turn out to be the brand new apex species.
The weblog submit attracted discussions on numerous fronts and sparked completely different sentiments on X (previously Twitter). Some voiced their settlement with the Ethereum founder, whereas others shared their criticisms of the submit.
An X account referred to as Emergent Perspective, which focuses on occasions within the web age, replied that they agree with Buterin’s ideas on the weblog submit. In keeping with the X consumer, individuals who argue that optimistic intentions can assure that AI “can’t hurt” scare them. “That has been true of completely nothing in human historical past, and this won’t be the primary exception,” they added.
I am with @VitalikButerin on this one.
The one individuals whose opinions on #AI scare me are the individuals who argue that “Optimistic Intentions = assure that AI can do no hurt.”
That has been true of completely nothing in human historical past, and this won’t be the primary exception. https://t.co/BVGwPjIbMg
— Emergent Perspective (@_emergent_) November 27, 2023
One other X consumer expressed different worries about AI. A group member who goes as “Wei Dai” on X stated that considered one of their considerations is that AI might inherently disfavor protection, decentralization, and democracy. In keeping with the consumer, AI may speed up the “fallacious mental fields,” and people pushing towards it might not be sufficient.
Associated: How decentralization can mitigate ‘dystopic’ synthetic intelligence dangers — SingularityNET exec
Not everybody agreed with Buterin’s sentiment. One other group member criticized Buterin and claimed that know-how specialists like Buterin “appear to have a whole disregard or immature view” of human psychology. The group member argued that the motivation behind constructing “morally poor” human experiences is at all times cash. The X consumer urged the group to know each issues and folks and never only one or the opposite.
the issue with Vitalik’s submit imo:
he has a predefined thought of ‘humanitarian values’
however i dont suppose these are a priori
i imagine the values come after and with the techcfr horse-carriage riders when the motorcar made its intro
typically i feel he is a gud man tho https://t.co/6ZWjWT9fdZ
— 0xBlixa (@0xBlixa) November 28, 2023
In the meantime, a group member additionally argued on X that one of many issues with the weblog submit is Buterin’s predefined thought of humanitarian values. The group member defined that these shouldn’t be predefined and should come after and with the know-how.
Whereas many expressed their settlement and disagreements, others merely sat on the fence, saying they sit up for collaborating in humanity’s collective effort to seek out the solutions.
Journal: Actual AI use instances in crypto, No. 1: The perfect cash for AI is crypto
