Voyager Digital was ‘no higher than a home of playing cards’ — CFTC commissioner

by Jeremy

A commissioner for the US Commodity Futures Buying and selling Fee (CFTC) has slammed Voyager Digital for its errors that ultimately led to the lack of billions of {dollars} of buyer funds.

In an Oct. 12 assertion, Commissioner Kristin Johnson took purpose at Voyager for deceptive practices, ignoring warning indicators, and “bare-bones due diligence,” which did not defend clients.

“Due to Voyager’s failures, the corporate grew to become no higher than a home of playing cards.”

The commodities mentioned Voyager turned a blind eye to what its subsidiary funding corporations had been doing with its personal buyer funds:

“It’s astounding that Voyager did not exert stress on the corporations the place it invested its clients’ belongings.”

“As an alternative of demanding that funding corporations that acquired buyer belongings supply larger ranges of transparency, Voyager shirked the long-established expectations for custodians and easily dispatched buyer funds with little effort to protect the identical,” she added.

Johnson’s feedback got here after the regulator, together with the Federal Commerce Fee, filed parallel lawsuits in opposition to Voyager’s former CEO Stephen Ehrlich on Oct. 12.

The CFTC lawsuit alleges Ehrlich and Voyager performed fraud and “registration failures” over its platform and its “unregistered commodity pool”.

The FTC, then again, reached a proposed settlement with Voyager, banning the agency from providing, advertising, or selling any services or products that might be used to deposit, trade, make investments, or withdraw any belongings, in accordance to an Oct. 12 assertion.

Voyager and its associates agreed to a judgment of $1.65 billion, which is able to go towards repaying clients within the chapter proceedings.

In the meantime, a separate Oct. 12 assertion from CFTC Commissioner Caroline Pham mentioned the regulator will proceed to pursue motion in opposition to cryptocurrency corporations that misuse buyer funds:

“There’s a important distinction between managing investor cash for the aim of buying and selling derivatives, and taking deposits and offering loans to others. With out financing and client credit score, our economic system would grind to a halt.”

Associated: CFTC points $54M default judgment in opposition to dealer in crypto fraud scheme

Nevertheless, Pham thinks the CFTC could have stepped exterior the bounds of its authority in deciphering what constitutes a commodity pool operator:

“Such an interpretation is an overreach past our statutory authority and would disrupt well-established authorized and regulatory frameworks for lending to establishments and client finance.”

On Sept. 7, Pham referred to as for the CFTC to determine a cryptocurrency regulatory pilot program which might handle the dangers retail buyers face.

Voyager filed for Chapter 11 chapter in July 2022 the place it indicated that it might owe anyplace between $1 billion to $10 billion in belongings to greater than 100,000 collectors.

The cryptocurrency brokerage agency opened withdrawals for patrons in June.

Journal: Crypto regulation: Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the ultimate say?